Search This Blog

Saturday, June 18, 2022

CIVILIAN COURT-MARTIAL DEFENSE LAWYER: Senior Military Officer Represented by Attorney Richard V. Stevens Retires Honorably, at Highest Rank, after Officer Grade Determination (OGD)

 

Military Defense Lawyer (Former JAG Attorney) News:

Recently, a senior military officer defended by attorney Richard V. Stevens (Military Defense Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens, P.C.) who had previously received a disputed administrative disciplinary action retired honorably from the military, at the highest rank he held. 

Because this was an administrative case, there are Privacy Act issues and regulations that preclude the reporting of specific details.  However, what can be generally described is…

This case began as a very serious criminal investigation, in which the client was accused of a crime he did not commit.  The investigation seemed to be based more on assumptions than any fact or evidence that was objectively incriminating.  After a very lengthy investigation, no court-martial charges were preferred, and the criminal aspect of the case was dropped.  A low-level administrative disciplinary action was taken due to an ancillary issue. 

During the course of the investigation, the accused officer’s retirement was placed on hold.  After the case was concluded, and when the client applied to retire, an Officer Grade Determination (OGD) was triggered and Attorney Stevens represented the client in that action.  In response to the OGD notification, the defense submitted a rebuttal detailing the exemplary service of the officer at the highest rank he held.  After consideration at the Secretary level, the senior officer client was notified that he would retire at the highest rank he held.

He now moves on to the next chapter in his life, without the stain of a reduced retirement rank along with the significant financial penalty of such a retirement reduction.  While the defense was successful in this military case, it is important to understand that every case has different facts, and success in some previous case(s) does not guarantee success in any particular future case.  No military lawyer or civilian defense lawyer, including those who specialize in military law as we do, can guarantee the outcome of any military case. 

For more information about the military justice system, particularly administrative disciplinary cases, please see:

https://militaryadvocate.com/practice-areas/administrative-discipline-actions/

https://militaryadvocate.com/practice-areas/article-15-njp-captains-mast-office-hours/

https://militaryadvocate.com/practice-areas/administrative-dischargeseparation/

https://militaryadvocate.com/practice-areas/performance-report-appeals/

We offer free consultations for a case you may be involved in.  Just call us. 

Thank you. 

By:  Attorney Richard V. Stevens

Civilian criminal defense lawyer and military defense lawyer

Military Defense Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens, P.C.

https://militaryadvocate.com/

Blog postscript: I (attorney Richard V. Stevens) am a former active duty military lawyer (JAG). My perspectives and advice, therefore, are based upon my experience as military defense lawyer and as a civilian criminal defense lawyer practicing exclusively in the area of military law and military justice. This blog addresses issues in military law, military justice, military discipline, military defense, court-martial practice, the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and other military and/or legal topics. Nothing posted in this blog should be substituted for legal advice in any particular case. If you seek legal advice for a particular case, please contact The Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens for a free consultation. These military defense law offices are located in the Washington DC, Northern Virginia, Maryland, National Capital Region (NCR), but the military defense representation is worldwide – when necessary, the attorneys travel to wherever the client is stationed around the world.


CIVILIAN COURT-MARTIAL DEFENSE LAWYER: NO DISCIPLINARY ACTION TAKEN AGAINST MILITARY OFFICER REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEY RICHARD V. STEVENS

 

Military Defense Lawyer (Former JAG Attorney) News:

Recently, a military officer defended by attorney Richard V. Stevens (Military Defense Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens, P.C.) who was investigated for alleged crimes against a civilian had the case against him dropped and he was cleared. 

Because of the sensitive nature of this case, and the outcome of the investigation, no details will be provided except to explain that the military officer was accused of committing crimes that he did commit, and the case against him was dropped. 

While this military case did not result in military charges or discipline, it is important to understand that every case has different facts, and success in previous cases does not guarantee success in any particular future case.  No military lawyer or civilian defense lawyer, including those who specialize in military law, can guarantee the outcome of any military trial or case. 

For more information about the military justice system, please see:

https://militaryadvocate.com/

We offer free consultations for a case you may be involved in.  Just call us. 

Thank you. 

By:  Attorney Richard V. Stevens

Civilian criminal defense lawyer and military defense lawyer

Military Defense Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens, P.C.

https://militaryadvocate.com/

Blog postscript: I (attorney Richard V. Stevens) am a former active duty military lawyer (JAG). My perspectives and advice, therefore, are based upon my experience as military defense lawyer and as a civilian criminal defense lawyer practicing exclusively in the area of military law and military justice. This blog addresses issues in military law, military justice, military discipline, military defense, court-martial practice, the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and other military and/or legal topics. Nothing posted in this blog should be substituted for legal advice in any particular case. If you seek legal advice for a particular case, please contact The Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens for a free consultation. These military defense law offices are located in the Washington DC, Northern Virginia, Maryland, National Capital Region (NCR), but the military defense representation is worldwide – when necessary, the attorneys travel to wherever the client is stationed around the world.

CIVILIAN COURT-MARTIAL DEFENSE LAWYER: LARCENY AND FRAUDULENT PCS VOUCHER ALLEGATIONS DROPPED FOR MILITARY OFFICER REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEY RICHARD V. STEVENS (UCMJ ARTICLES 107, 121, 132)

 

Military Defense Lawyer (Former JAG Attorney) News:

Recently, a military officer defended by attorney Richard V. Stevens (Military Defense Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens, P.C.) who was accused of, and investigated for, alleged larceny (UCMJ Article 121), fraudulent PCS vouchers (UCMJ Article 132), and false official statements (UCMJ Article 107) had the case against him dropped and he was cleared to continue his military career.

The military officer client was accused of these offenses after a PCS move in which the vouchers filed were questioned by military investigators.  Military regulations regarding reimbursable expenses and entitlements can be complicated, and sometimes military investigators do not understand what is, and is not, permitted.  Ultimately, based on the documents submitted by the accused, and applying them to the appropriate regulations, the case against the client was dropped, and no disciplinary action was taken. 

While this military case was successfully defended, it is important to understand that every case has different facts, and success in previous cases does not guarantee success in any particular future case.  No military lawyer or civilian defense lawyer, including those who specialize in military law, can guarantee the outcome of any military trial or case. 

For more information about the military justice system, particularly cases alleging larceny, wrongful appropriation, and fraudulent travel vouchers in violation of UCMJ Articles 121, 107, and 132, please see:

https://militaryadvocate.com/military-larceny-wrongful-appropriation-and-fraud-defense-including-military-travel-voucher-and-entitlement-fraud-defense-ucmj-articles-121-123a/

We offer free consultations for a case you may be involved in.  Just call us. 

Thank you. 

By:  Attorney Richard V. Stevens

Civilian criminal defense lawyer and military defense lawyer

Military Defense Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens, P.C.

https://militaryadvocate.com/

Blog postscript: I (attorney Richard V. Stevens) am a former active duty military lawyer (JAG). My perspectives and advice, therefore, are based upon my experience as military defense lawyer and as a civilian criminal defense lawyer practicing exclusively in the area of military law and military justice. This blog addresses issues in military law, military justice, military discipline, military defense, court-martial practice, the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and other military and/or legal topics. Nothing posted in this blog should be substituted for legal advice in any particular case. If you seek legal advice for a particular case, please contact The Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens for a free consultation. These military defense law offices are located in the Washington DC, Northern Virginia, Maryland, National Capital Region (NCR), but the military defense representation is worldwide – when necessary, the attorneys travel to wherever the client is stationed around the world.

CIVILIAN COURT-MARTIAL DEFENSE LAWYER: TWO ENLISTED MILITARY MEMBERS REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEY RICHARD V. STEVENS HAVE SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES DROPPED (UCMJ ARTICLE 120)

 

Military Defense Lawyer (Former JAG Attorney) News:

Recently, two enlisted military members defended by attorney Richard V. Stevens (Military Defense Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens, P.C.) had the sexual assault cases they faced dropped by the military before court-martial charges were preferred against them (UCMJ Article 120).

The first military client was a non-commissioned officer who was accused of sexual assault by another military member who had a casual dating relationship with the accused military member.  As happens more and more frequently in military cases, the text messages they sent to each other told the real story, and led to the case being dropped.  As reflected in the text messages, the sexual interactions between the two were completely consensual, but the complainant wanted a more serious relationship, and the accused only wanted to remain casual.  In the complainant’s anger and vindictiveness, she claimed the accused had sexually assaulted her, but the text messages made clear that wasn’t the case.  Ultimately, the military dropped the case before preferring court-martial charges against the accused military member. 

The second military client was a junior enlisted member who was accused of sexual assault by a military superior.  Again, the text messages they sent to each other told the real story, and led to the case being dropped and the complainant facing investigation.  In this case, the complainant abused her position as superior to the accused and was in a prohibited romantic relationship with him.  When questions started arising about the complainant’s behavior toward the accused, she falsely claimed sexual assault.  She did not admit to having any type of personal relationship with the accused, and she was likely counting on him not revealing their consensual relationship to shield himself from possible disciplinary action.  She was wrong.  The text messages and other corroborating evidence were revealed to military investigators, and the case against the accused was dropped, and a disciplinary investigation was begun against the complainant.      

Had there been court-martial trials and sex crime convictions in these cases, the clients could have been sentenced to a punitive discharge, a lengthy term of confinement in prison and, in addition, they would have been required to register as sex offenders.  When false allegations are made, they put innocent people in very serious jeopardy.  Their lives and futures could be forever altered.  Thankfully, the cases were dropped and these two clients were spared this risk of devastation to their futures. 

While these military sexual assault cases were successfully defended, and never reached court-martial, it is important to understand that every case has different facts, and success in previous cases does not guarantee success in any particular future case.  No military lawyer or civilian defense lawyer, including those who specialize in military law, can guarantee the outcome of any military trial or case. 

For more information about the military justice system, particularly cases alleging rape and/or sexual assault in violation of UCMJ Article 120, type "rape" or "sexual assault" into the search bar above the blog posts and see:

https://militaryadvocate.com/military-offenses/sex-crimes/

We offer free consultations for a case you may be involved in.  Just call us. 

Thank you. 

By:  Attorney Richard V. Stevens

Civilian criminal defense lawyer and military defense lawyer

Military Defense Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens, P.C.

https://militaryadvocate.com/

Blog postscript: I (attorney Richard V. Stevens) am a former active duty military lawyer (JAG). My perspectives and advice, therefore, are based upon my experience as military defense lawyer and as a civilian criminal defense lawyer practicing exclusively in the area of military law and military justice. This blog addresses issues in military law, military justice, military discipline, military defense, court-martial practice, the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and other military and/or legal topics. Nothing posted in this blog should be substituted for legal advice in any particular case. If you seek legal advice for a particular case, please contact The Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens for a free consultation. These military defense law offices are located in the Washington DC, Northern Virginia, Maryland, National Capital Region (NCR), but the military defense representation is worldwide – when necessary, the attorneys travel to wherever the client is stationed around the world.