Military Defense Lawyer
(Former JAG Attorney) News:
Recently, a junior enlisted military member
defended by attorney Richard V. Stevens (Military Defense Law Offices of
Richard V. Stevens, P.C.) had the sexual assault court-martial case he faced
dropped by the military as trial approached (UCMJ Article 120).
The military client was accused of, and
investigated for, allegedly sexually and physically assaulting a civilian female. Court-martial charges were preferred against
the client and the case proceeded past the Article 32 hearing and was referred
to trial by general court-martial.
As the case proceeded toward the “felony” type
military trial, the defense filed discovery requests and notices specifically
identifying issues that raised questions about the complainant’s credibility
and motives. This included her going to
the client’s home after just having met him, while she had a boyfriend. The complainant told a close friend that the
activities between them were consensual and she was excited about them. After that, however, when her boyfriend found
out, the complainant’s story changed and she alleged physical and sexual
assault. However, her story was not corroborated
by the forensic evidence.
Ultimately, as trial approached and the
defense requested the complainant’s friends and boyfriend as trial witnesses,
because they knew the truth of how her story had changed, the complainant elected
to withdraw from the case and would not participate. The government then dropped the court-martial
case against the client and he was cleared to continue his military career.
Had there been a court-martial trial and sex
crime conviction in this case, the client could have been sentenced to a
dishonorable discharge, a lengthy term of confinement in prison (possibly
decades) and, in addition, he would have been required to register as a sex
offender. Thankfully, the court-martial case was dropped and he was
spared this risk of devastation to his future.
While this military court-martial and sexual
assault case was successfully defended, it is important to understand that
every case has different facts, and success in previous cases does not
guarantee success in any particular future case. No military lawyer
or civilian defense lawyer, including those who specialize in military law, can
guarantee the outcome of any military trial or case.
For more information about the military
justice system, particularly cases alleging rape and/or sexual assault in
violation of UCMJ Article 120, type "rape" or "sexual
assault" into the search bar above the blog posts and see:
https://militaryadvocate.com/military-offenses/sex-crimes/
We offer free consultations for a case you may
be involved in. Just call us.
Thank you.
By: Attorney Richard V. Stevens
Civilian criminal defense lawyer and military
defense lawyer
Military Defense Law Offices of Richard V.
Stevens, P.C.
https://militaryadvocate.com/
Blog
postscript: I (attorney Richard V. Stevens) am a former active duty military
lawyer (JAG). My perspectives and advice, therefore, are based upon my
experience as military defense lawyer and as a civilian criminal defense lawyer
practicing exclusively in the area of military law and military justice. This
blog addresses issues in military law, military justice, military discipline,
military defense, court-martial practice, the Uniform Code of Military Justice
(UCMJ) and other military and/or legal topics. Nothing posted in this blog
should be substituted for legal advice in any particular case. If you seek
legal advice for a particular case, please contact The Law Offices of Richard
V. Stevens for a free consultation. These military defense law offices are
located in the Washington DC, Northern Virginia, Maryland, National Capital
Region (NCR), but the military defense representation is worldwide – when
necessary, the attorneys travel to wherever the client is stationed around the
world.